Govt disarmament drive in north yields zero guns

By Online Team

25th June 2012:

Arrow Boys militia armed by govt: FILE PHOTO

An investigative report by the Institute of War and Peace Reporters [IWPR] indicates that the government’s northern Uganda disarmament programme has “failed to recover any weapons at all” because, according to experts, the government failed “to engage effectively with the local population.”

The scheme is the latest to be launched in northern Uganda since the 20 year conflict with the rebel Lord’s Resistance Army [LRA] ended in 2006. The conflict led to the death of more than 100,000 people while nearly two million were forced into displacement camps. Thousands of small arms, many of them formally used by the rebels, remain unaccounted for.

IWPR reporters said the failure of the month-long amnesty for handing in firearms, which covered all the districts that form the Acholi sub-region and ended in April, has been put down to a lack of trust in the Ugandan security services which ran the campaign, and to the failure to engage key figures in local communities.

“For now, we have not found that level of credibility [for the disarmament programme], so I am not very sure how many people will come forward,” Daniel Komakech, a peace and conflict analyst at Gulu University in the northern Acholi region, told IWPR.

“We need the elders, we need the religious leaders, we need the traditional leaders and even academia. The process of disarmament and reintegration [of former LRA members] must involve less of the security agents and more of the civil society – that is where the trust is.”

Since the LRA left Uganda in 2006, hundreds of former rebels have come out of the bush and have gone through a process of reintegration into society. There are suspicions that many never handed their weapons over to the Ugandan authorities.

Many more weapons that the government controversially handed out to a host of civilian militias to use in self defence against the LRA at the height of the conflict have also disappeared into thin air.  The high rate of illicit possession means that guns are often used in armed robberies and other crimes, and when land disputes turn violent.

Martin Amoru, who is regional police commander for northern Uganda and is in charge of the disarmament programme, told IWPR why it continued to be needed.  “…The region is coming out of rebellion, the kind of rebellion where guns were used and there was a lot of [arms] infiltration from different sources,” he said. “We found it necessary that there should be a mop-up.”

Lawyers in the north say that because the amnesty on firearms was initiated locally and not mandated by central government or parliament, it lacked credibility in the eyes of the public. Many people feared that if they handed in their weapons, there was no guarantee of immunity.

“There must be some assurance from the government [and] from the army that these people who surrender their firearms will not be prosecuted,” lawyer Paul Manzi said, adding that such schemes would not be effective “unless the government comes up with a general amnesty and says, “look guys, if you have firearms, a grenade or any other military ordinance, bring it forward and you will not be prosecuted.”

People living in the Acholi sub-region have largely welcomed the disarmament programme as it could help cut the high rate of violent crime.  “When somebody has a gun illegally, he would be tempted to use it for robbing people,” said Fredrick Okecha, who lives in the village of Pabit East in the Nwoya district. “So it is really necessary that all these illegal guns should be taken back to the government.”

At the same time, Okecha criticised police who “don’t move into parishes and villages” to ensure that everyone was aware of the disarmament scheme and what it involved. Without more effective engagement, he doubts people will come to understand that possessing a firearm is illegal.

Manzi agreed, saying that people were likely to keep weapons concealed, and the authorities should “assure the general population that it is in their interest to bring out this illegal military equipment”.

Other commentators say that recovering lethal weapons is complicated by the wider challenges of poverty and underdevelopment affecting the north after years of war.

Kenneth Oketta, who heads the Acholi cultural institution Ker Kwaro Acholi, said many people had turned to crime as a major income source. Northern Uganda has the highest rate of unemployment in the country, and international aid agencies have departed since the majority of those displaced by the war returned to their homes.

“There is a big challenge. People have seen the gain they get from having a gun – though those gains are not legitimate,” he said.  In an unstable environment, few are likely to come forward with information about weapons held by others.  “It is a challenge for those community members to disclose that so-and-so has a gun – they also fear revenge,” Oketta said.

If disarmament is to be successful, experts say, the process needs to start with building trust between communities, the security services and local leaders. Only then will strategies like offering amnesties work.

“It is good to put pressure in terms of deadlines so as to yield results, but that alone is counterproductive [if] the trust is not yet built,” Aloysius Malagala, head of the Institute for Peace and Strategic Studies at Gulu University, said. “I think that is exemplified by [the amnesty], so that indicates that they need to have another approach.”

Malagala argues that the authorities should target people who used who feel they have no option but to hold and use guns, and try to offer them active employment and other alternatives.  “It’s not only the role of the army and the police; it’s now the role of the government and the local leaders to make sure that people can be helped and [to] uplift the standard of living,” he said.

The police chief of Amoru district admitted that the disarmament plan could have been communicated to the Acholi people more effectively, but insisted that it was making progress with the support of community groups like local leaderships and religious groups.  END.  Login to www.ugandacorrespondent.com every Monday to read our top stories mid-week for our updates

Follow us: Twitter: @UGCorrespondent

Follow us: Facebook: Uganda Correspondent


Visited 87 times, 1 visits today


2013/3/24

I will throw a hot stone behind CJ Odoki’s back
By John Baptist Oloka 25th March 2013:

The media broke news of More... (0)


2013/2/26

The late Mzee Kaguta was a naughty boy
By Lawrence Kasozi

25th February 2013: This is totally out of More... (0)


2013/2/26

Museveni is pathological hypocrite
By Norman Miwambo

25th February 2013: I don’t believe Museveni was More... (0)


2013/2/17

Obote is crying for his beloved country
By M. Suleman

18th February 2013: Uganda’s late president Dr Apollo More... (0)


2013/2/3

Wake up fools: Army took over long ago
By Bernard Ddumba

4th Feb 2013: Over the last two weeks, I seriously More... (0)


2013/2/3

NRM revolution is eating its own children
By Charles Businge

4th February 2013: In 1986, the new leadership promised More... (0)


2013/1/27

It’s lawful to resist coup plotters – let’s do it
By Elijah M. Tumwebaze

28th January 2013: In a powerful opinion article that More... (0)


2013/1/27

Our parliament only exists on paper
By M. Suleman

28th January 2013: Uganda is a country endowed with More... (0)


2013/1/22

Museveni is right to call NRM MPs idiots
By M. Suleman

21st Jan 2013: In the drama that followed More... (0)


2012/12/18

Isn’t Museveni a deranged psychopath?
By M. Suleman

17th Dec 2012: An emotional, grief-stricken, and More... (0)


 

World News

 
 
 

 

 

Follow us